Thursday, January 29, 2015

Why I Love Powtoon

Every teacher in the world should give me a resounding AMEN when I say, "By the end of the day I am tired of saying the same thing." You say it once to the whole class. Then some kid asks the same question you just answered. Then someone asks for clarification (not annoying, but still a repetition). Then you explain while helping someone get back on track. Then, if your lucky, that class is over and you repeat this whole process 4 more times for your next 4 classes.

This year I vowed to myself that I would do more to ease this frustration. One tool I have been using is the video and presentation creator Powtoon. This Web 2.0 tool allows you to create up to a 5 minute video and/or slide presentation using tons of free animations and tools. Throughout the year I have used this to create review materials and to walk through the instructions for a project or in class activity. I send them to YouTube then post them in my iTunesU course for learners to use as many times as they want. A learner who was absent still gets to hear my explanation. A learner who can't remember what I said in class can watch it over and over again at home.

I think this has been a huge help for my learners. They can watch. Pause. Watch again. And then, if they need help they ask instead of me being the first stop. I have created videos for lots of things, and I don't always use Powtoon, but for some simple reviews that I want to be kinda fun and light, Powtoon has been perfect. My most recent use has been for some grammar review and for some videos that I made as options as review of writing advice for the AP exam.

On a different note, Powtoon will only allow 5 minutes with a free account AND you must record one audio file over all slides. You can not record one slide at a time (or if you can, I have not figured that out). So, keep those limits in mind before you start.

Happy video making!





Tuesday, January 27, 2015

Technology Rich, but Innovation Poor

In my ten years as an educator I have been lucky enough to be named Teacher of the Year for my campus. When this happened, I apparently fooled some people into thinking I was better than most at my job. When people started to think there was some merit to the idea, I was inundated with opportunities for PD. I was invited to work with Apple on the creation of iTunesU courses for TASA-we even got to work at Apple headquarters in Austin! I was invited to help unveil said courses at SXSW conference in Austin. I was even able to attend Alan November's BLC in Boston, MA. What a lucky chain of events for me!

Every step along the way there would be these sessions I would sit in where I would feel like the presenter was stuck in my past. I'd sit through a presentation about offering students choice or about alternative assessment or about formative assessment and I would think: "I've been doing that years...where have you been?" I know you've all been there too!

Well, something came across my computer screen today from Alan November's newsletter that really got me thinking. I've heard the term "Technology Rich, but Innovation Poor" come from Alan November's mouth several times over the years. Today, he solidified that statement for me in a way that it had not been before. Check out his article "Clearing the Confusion between Technology Rich and Innovative Poor: Six Questions" to see what has me a little shaken up. I had one project in mind as I read this article. One that is new. One that I know needs a little work. But still one that I was super proud of. I couldn't answer yes to ALL six questions. Only 4 of the 6. I am not sure how to feel about this. 

I feel partially proud that I could answer "yes" to four of them. I know of others assignments where the answer would be no to all 6 (P.S. I don't do those anymore LOL!). But, I also feel a bit down that it wasn't all 6, which is what I was hoping for.

So, now I am thinking:
*Does every assignment need to be a "yes" to all 6 questions?
*I think a balance exists between truly innovative and truly necessary. But what is that balance? Is there a percentage of innovation I should be happy with while still striving for 100% innovation?
*Do I do anything that is a "yes" to all 6 questions? (I will think on this and come back with an answer)
*How can I adapt at least the assessment and lessons I had in mind to include those other two components I am missing? (I will think on this and come back to it as well)

Alan November and the November Learning crew are looking for feedback and thoughts about this article and these questions. Feel free to wander on over to his newsletter and leave some thoughts. Or hit him up on Twitter (@globalearner or @NLearning) I think I need some more processing time first.

Monday, January 12, 2015

Why the Standards Matter!

Every year I hear the same discussions going on between colleagues, our campus administration, our district administration, and even in my own head. The conversation about standards. Regardless of what standards your state, school, or course may fall under, the reality of the situation is that the standards matter--even the ones that are poorly written or poorly aligned.

I can hear the resounding "This woman is crazy!" coming from the masses, so stay with me for a second. Can you imagine what public education would be like if every teacher was dedicated to the same task, dedicated to monitoring and encouraging the progress of EACH learner, and actually stayed on some semblance of the same page as the rest of their team, department, and/or campus? No? Me neither. That land resides somewhere over the rainbow!

Well, if we all could get on board with teaching the standards that are outlined for us, we could get so much closer to this Oz-like land where all we had to do to get rid of our Wicked Witches is toss a bucket of water (if only it were that easy...ha!).

I hear all of the rumbling every year about how "We've always taught ____" or "The kids really enjoy ___" or even "The standards are crap, so I don't think I have to teach them." Regardless of the current mindset that exists amongst my colleagues, the fact of the matter is, the standards create an even playing field. If every teacher in every grade level monitored the individual progress of each learner based on these standards, we would never have a child left behind. We would never have a child reach high school unable to read. We would never have a child reach high school unable to communicate effectively. We would never have a child unable to balance a check book or maintain a budget.

Now, I don't mean to make this sound like all teachers have this attitude. Any teacher knows this is not the case. However, teachers are just like the learners. You get one bad apple. One teacher with a bad attitude. One teacher who refuses to get on board. And slowly that bad attitude, that maverick spirit, is infecting everything. And within a year you have at least two mavericks and at least 150 learners no longer anywhere near the same ballpark as the rest of the crowd.

A certain amount of maverick spirit-you know the kind that pushes the kids beyond the standards-is good. We should harness that kind of reckless abandon. The kind where the bar is raised, learners are held to high standards, and we guarantee that our lesson design leaves no child from reaching the minimum standard. However, the maverick spirit where the standards are thrown out the window and you do what you want because you think you know better, that has got to go.

Too often we, as educators, can't separate the standards from the testing. I hate the testing. I hate everything about the testing. I hate for my sophomore in high school. I hate it for my kindergartner. And, I already hate the idea of it for my 11 month old. But, the testing and the standards are not one and the same. They are two very different things. So, if I'm talking to you, take off the pointy hat and nose. If I'm talking to a colleague of yours, toss the bucket of water and help bring him/her back to reality. Then, join me over the rainbow where we all can agree that we must have standards.

We must guarantee that each child makes progress in each standard each year. We must ensure that every child plays on the same playing field as their peers. Some need an extra coach or an extra practice, but they all should be on the same field together.